dc.contributor.author | du Rose, Alister | |
dc.contributor.author | Branney, Jonathan | |
dc.contributor.author | Breen, Alan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-20T13:04:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-20T13:04:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | du Rose, A. J., Branney, J. and Breen, A. C., 2021. Association of spinal manipulative therapy with changes in cervical motion segment interactions in patients with neck pain: an observational study with matched asymptomatic controls. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 44 (6), 475-486 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.07.002 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0161-4754 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://aecc.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/158 | |
dc.description | Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The objectives of this study were to determine (1) if maximal intervertebral range of motion (IV-RoMmax) and laxity interactions exist in the cervical spine during flexion, (2) if there are differences in IV-RoMmax or laxity parameters between baseline and follow-up in both patients with neck pain and asymptomatic controls, and (3) if there is an effect on IV-RoMmax/laxity relationships in patients with neck pain after spinal manipulative therapy.
Methods: Twenty-nine patients with subacute or chronic neck pain and 33 asymptomatic controls were imaged during flexion and extension, pre and post a course of cervical chiropractic manipulation (patient group only), using a standardized quantitative fluoroscopy acquisition protocol.
Results: Significant correlations between IV-RoMs were found in both neck pain and neck pain–free populations at baseline and follow-up. Positive relationships were found between C2-C3 and C3-C4 and C4-C5 and C5-C6 IV-RoM in both populations. A negative correlation was found in the patient group at baseline between C1-C2 and C5-C6, but not at follow-up. Significant relationships were also found for segmental laxity, with a negative correlation found at C1-C2 and C5-C6 in the patient group only and at baseline only.
Conclusion: Distinct relationships were found between both intraregional IV-RoM and laxity, many of which were present in both groups at baseline and follow-up, suggestive of normal kinematic behaviors. Changes in correlations unique to the patient group may be indicative of a change in regional kinematics resulting from the manipulation intervention. Spinal manipulative therapy may have a therapeutic effect by influencing cervical kinematics at the regional level. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics | en |
dc.title | Association of spinal manipulative therapy with changes in cervical motion segment interactions in patients with neck pain: an observational study with matched asymptomatic controls | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.07.002 | |